Строительный блокнот  Introduction to electronics 

1 2 3 4 5 6 [ 7 ] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300

2.2 Inductor Voli-Secoiid balance, Capaciwr Charge Balance, and the Small-Ripple Approsinuition 19

position 1, and the process repeats.

h is of interest to calculate the inductor current ripple Д(. As illustrated in Fig. 2.10, the peak inductor current is equal to tlie dc component / plus the peak-to-average ripple Д/. This peak current flows through not only the inductor, hut also through the semiconductor devices that comprise the switch. Knowledge of the peak current is necessary when specifying the ratings of these devices.

Since we know the slope of the inductor current during the first subinterval, and we also know the length of the fust subinterval, we can calculate the ripple magnitude. The J,(f) waveform is symmetrical about /, and hence during the first subinterval the current increases by ЗЛУ, (since Д/ is the peak ripple, the peak-to-peiik ripple is 2Ai,). So the change in current, 2Af is equal to the sk)pe (the applied inductor voltage divided by L) times the length of the first subinterval (-ОГ:

(change in i,) = (slopeKlenglh of subiriterval)

(2.14)

(DTI

Solution for Д, yields

Typical values of Aij lie in the range of 10% to 20% of the full-load value of the dc component /. h is undesirable to allow Д, to become too large; doing so would increase the peak currents of the inductor and of the semiconductor switching devices, and would increase their size and cost. So by design the inductor current ripple is also usually small compared to the dc component /. The small-ripple approximation {,(/) = / is usually justified for the inductor current.

The inductor value can be chosen such that a desired current ripple Дг, is attained. Solution of Eq. (2.15) for the inductance L yields

L = h Lot (2.I6)

This equatitm is commonly used to select the value of inductance in the buck converter.

It is entirely possible to solve converters exactly, without use of the small-ripple approximation. For example, one could use the Laplace transform to write expressions for the waveforms of the circuits of Figs. 2.8(a) and 2.8(b). One could then invert the transforms, match boundary conditions, and find the periodic steady-state solution of the circuit. Having done so, one could then find the dc components of the waveforms and the peak values. But this is a great deal of work, and the results are nearly always intractable. Besides, the extra work involved m writing equations that exacdy describe the ripple is a waste of time, since ihe ripple is small and is undesired. The small-ripple approximation is easy to apply, and quickly yields simple expressions for the dc components of the converter waveforms.

The inductor current waveform of Fig. 2.10 is drawn under steady-state conditions, with the converter operating in equilibrium. Lets consider next what happens to the inductor current when the ctmverter is first turned on. Suppose that the inductor current and output voltage are initially zero, and an input voltage is then applied. As shown in Fig. 2.11, /,(0) is zero. During the first subinterval, with the switch in position 1, we know that the inductor current will increase, with a slope of (1/, - v)/L and with V initially zero. Next, with the switch in position 2, the inductor current will change with a slope of - v/L; since V is initially zero, this slope is essentially zero. It can be seen that there is a net increase in inductor current over the first switching period, because is greater than r,{OJ. Since the inductor current




0 dj 7 2Г,

Fig. 2.11 Indueior current waveform during convener turn-on irausietit.

flows to the output, tlie output capacitor will charge slightly, and v will increase slightly. Tlie process repeats during the second and succeeding switching periods, with the inductor current increasing during each subinterval 1 and decreasing during each subinterval 2.

As the output capacitor continues to charge and v increases, the slope during .subinterval 1 decreases while the slope during subinterval 2 becomes more negative. Eventually, the point is reached where the 1псгеа,че in inductor current during subinterval 1 i,4 equal to the decrease in inductor current during subinterval 2. There is then no net change in inductor current over a complete switching period, and the converter operates in steady state. The converter waveforms are periodic: i,(tlTJ) = iiiin + 1)7)-From this point on, the inductor current waveform appears as in Fig. 2.10.

The requirement that, in equilibrium, the net change in inductor current over one .switching period be zero lead.s us to ii way to find steady-state conditions in any switching converter: the principle of inductor volt-second balance. Given the definint; relation of an inductor:

Integration over one complete .switching period, say from f = 0 to 7j, yields

<,(r,)- .(0) = [S,(t}fi(

t2.17)

(2.18)

This equation slates that the net change in inductor current overtme switching period, given by the left-hand side of Eq. (2.18), is proportional to the integral of the applied inductor voltage over the interval. In steady state, the initial and final values of the inductor current are equal, and hence the left-hand side of Eq. (2. IS) is zero. Therefore, in steady state the integral of the applied inductor voltage must be zero:

(2.19)

The right-hand side of Eq. (2.19) has the units of volt-setonds or flux-linkages. Equation (2.19) states that the total area, or net volt-second.s, under ihe Vfji) waveform must be zero.

An equivalent form is obtained by dividing both .sides of Eq. (2.19) by the switching period

The right-hand side ofEq. (2.20) is recognized as the average value, twdc component, of v;((j. Etjuation



2.2 liiduaor Voh-Secoiid Balance, Capaciwr Charge Balance, and the Small-Ripple Appro.i:iiiia!ioii

Fig, 2.12 The principle of inductor volt-second balance: in steady state, tire net volt-seconds applied to an inductor (i.e., the total area Л) must be zero.

Total area X

DT, -►

(2.20) states that, in equilibrjiim, the applied inductor voltage must have zero dc component.

The inductor voltage waveform of Fig. 2.9 is reproduced in Fig. 2.12, with the area under the V;(0 curve specifically identified. The total area Я is given by the areas of the two rectangles, or

The average value is therefore

By equating {v,) to zero, and noting that D-) D= l,one obtains

ti = dv-{d + d)v = dv-v

Solution for V yields

(2.21)

(2.22)

(2.23)

(2,24)

which coincides with the result obtained previously, Eq. (2.3). So the principle of inductor volt-second balance allows us to derive an expression for the dc component of the converter output voltage. An advantage of this approach is its generality-it can be applied to any converter. One simply sketches the applied mductor voltage waveform, and equates the average value to zero. This method is used later in this chapter, to solve several more complicated converters.

Similar arguments can be applied to capacitors. The defining equation of a capacitor is

Integration of this equation over one switching period yields

(2.25)

(2.26)

In steady state, the net change over one switching period of the capacitor voltage must be zero, so that the left-hand side of Eq. (2.26) is equal to zero. Therefore, in equilibrium the integral of the capacitor current over one switching period (having the dimensions of amp-seconds, or charge) should be zero. There is no net change in capacitor charge in steady state. An equivalent statement is



1 2 3 4 5 6 [ 7 ] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300